Research · for Migrant & refugee health charities

Turned Away: Migrants, NHS Charging and the Registration Barrier

Published 2026-09-16 · Updated 2026-09-17

Everyone in England is entitled to register with a GP, regardless of immigration status. In practice, many migrants and people seeking asylum are wrongly turned away — and NHS charging rules deter people from seeking care even when they do not have to pay.

Imagine arriving somewhere new, unwell and exhausted, and being told there is a right to see a doctor — then standing at a reception desk being asked for a passport and a proof of address you simply do not have, and walking out with nothing. That scene repeats across the country every week. The person turned away is not being denied by the law, which is on their side; they are being denied by a front desk applying a rule that does not exist. For someone already frightened, already navigating a system in an unfamiliar language, one wrongful refusal can be enough to stop them ever trying again.

Entitled, but turned away

At Doctors of the World's London clinic, around 4 in 5 of the patients seen were unable to register with a GP despite being entitled — often because they were wrongly asked for a passport, proof of address or other documents they do not have. NHS guidance says practices do not need to ask for these.

GP registration at a Doctors of the World London clinicAround 4 in 5 patients seen were unable to register with a GP despite being entitled; about 1 in 5 could.0%25%50%75%100%Turned away despite being entitled~80%Able to register~20%
GP registration outcomes among patients at a Doctors of the World clinic. Source: Doctors of the World UK.

Read the long red bar as people, not percentages. Four in five of those who came through that clinic door had a right to a GP and were kept out of one anyway — each refusal an untreated infection left to spread, a pregnancy without antenatal care, a chronic condition drifting without the medication that keeps it in check. And these are the comparatively fortunate ones: they at least found their way to a charity clinic that knows the rules. Behind them are the people who were turned away once, believed it, and never came back, whose stories never reach a chart at all.

DeterredUpfront charging for some migrants deters people from seeking care they need — including many who are not actually liable to be charged.

Fear does not read the small print. Once word spreads that treatment can come with a bill, or that seeking care might be reported, people stay away — and the deterrent falls on those who owe nothing just as heavily as on anyone else. A parent hears that a hospital charged a neighbour and decides not to risk taking their feverish child; someone entitled to free care avoids the GP because they cannot be sure. The chilling effect is wider than the charge itself, and it works quietly, keeping people at home with problems that only grow.

What this means day to day

These barriers land in the body and in ordinary life. A cough that becomes something worse because there was nowhere to take it early. A wound that goes septic. Diabetes or blood pressure left unmanaged until it forces a crisis. People ration their own health, waiting until pain is unbearable before risking a hospital that might question their status or hand them a bill. For those seeking asylum — already carrying trauma, dispersal and uncertainty — the message that healthcare is a place of suspicion rather than safety pushes them away from exactly the support they need most, and often towards the emergency department as a last resort, in a worse condition, later than anyone would want.

Why it matters

These are administrative barriers, not clinical ones: incorrect document requests, confusion over charging, and fear. They push people away from primary care and towards crises and A&E, which is worse for the individual and more costly for the system. Clear registration rights and safe access are the fix, and both are policy choices.

That is what makes this so solvable. Nobody is short of doctors' skill or medical capacity here; people are being lost at the reception desk, to paperwork that need not be asked for and rules that are misunderstood. Registering everyone who is entitled, decoupling healthcare from immigration enforcement, and making it plain who is and is not liable to be charged are practical, achievable steps. Where clinics and charities apply the rules correctly, people do get care — proof that the barrier is not the law but its misapplication. A wall built out of confusion and fear can be taken down the same way it went up: by decision.

How to read this data

The registration figure is from Doctors of the World's own clinic population, which is not representative of all migrants but does show how the barriers operate. Confirm the latest figures before publishing. This is analysis of published data, not new research.

Why we're publishing this

Health Insurance UK is a commercial UK health-insurance resource, not a charity — but we compiled this evidence because the organisations defending migrants' and refugees' right to care deserve clear, citable numbers to make their case. A right that exists on paper but collapses at the front desk is not much of a right at all, and these figures show both the scale of the gap and how squarely it sits within policy's power to close. We stand with the clinicians, charities and community advocates working to make access real, and we want this data to strengthen the argument for registration rights and safe, unafraid access to care. Free to cite with attribution to Health Insurance UK. For the figures or a bespoke chart, get in touch.

Sources

  • Doctors of the World UK — impact of healthcare charges and registration barriers
Get your free quoteA specialist broker calls you back Start