Research · for Autism charities & autistic-led organisations

Pregnant and Autistic: Higher Perinatal Risks, Too Few Adjustments

Published 2026-09-22

Autistic women and birthing people have depression and anxiety recorded around pregnancy and birth far more often than non-autistic parents — in most studies more than twice as often — and Swedish national data show higher rates of some complications, including preterm birth and pre-eclampsia. Yet maternity care rarely adapts to them: in surveys, many describe births that overwhelmed their senses and appointments where they felt judged rather than helped.

Pregnancy brings more contact with health services than almost any other time of life: appointments, scans, examinations, questions, then a birth that may happen under bright lights, among strangers, with little warning of what comes next. For many autistic people each step carries a cost nobody in the room can see: the rushed explanation in a noisy clinic that cannot be followed; the crowded ward where a new parent is too overloaded to say what is wrong; the mother who stays quiet about struggling, because she fears it will make someone doubt she can care for her baby.

52.8%of pregnancies ending in a live birth among autistic members of a large Californian health system (1997–2024) had depression recorded during pregnancy, against 15.6% in the matched general population[1]
65%of autistic respondents to a mainly UK survey felt overwhelmed by sensory input while giving birth, against 29% of non-autistic respondents[2]
>80%of autistic mothers in an international survey worried that a professional's attitude towards them would change if they disclosed that they were autistic[3]

Autistic parents have been close to invisible in maternity research

Publishing the first national study of pregnancy outcomes in autistic women in 2018, Swedish researchers noted that "the consequences of autism in pregnancy outcomes have not been explored before"[4]. In 2021 a systematic review found just 13 studies on pregnancy and parenthood among autistic adults[5]; a 2026 mapping review for midwifery included 25 papers, only two of them cohort or comparative quantitative studies, and concluded that evidence on clinical outcomes "remained limited"[6].

Part of the reason is that many autistic parents are not yet recognised as autistic when they are pregnant; autistic women have long been diagnosed later than men, as our article on autistic women and girls sets out. In an international survey, 61% of autistic mothers with a formal diagnosis had been diagnosed or first suspected they were autistic after the birth of one of their children[3]. In a UK survey about care after pregnancy loss, 27 of the 48 autistic respondents who received care (56.3%) did not know they were autistic at the time[7]. In England, interviews with 18 autistic women and birthing people seen by specialist perinatal mental health teams found that for many it was the first time their autism had been explored in a mental health context[8].

The health needs are there before pregnancy begins. In Ontario, Canada, 31.8% of 6,870 autistic women aged 15 to 44 had a mood or anxiety disorder recorded over two years, against 13.4% of 2.69 million non-autistic women, alongside higher rates of chronic physical conditions and material deprivation[9].

Some pregnancy complications are more common, but the studies do not all agree

The Swedish study used national registers of singleton births from 2006 to 2014: 2,198 births to autistic women (the source's term is "women with autism") and 877,742 to women without an autism diagnosis[4]. Adjusting for age, country of birth, smoking, body mass index, previous births, year and psychotropic and antiepileptic medication, births to autistic women had higher odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio 1.30), driven by medically indicated rather than spontaneous preterm births; of pre-eclampsia, a serious blood-pressure condition (1.34); and of induction of labour (1.52) and elective caesarean (1.44). Emergency caesarean, gestational diabetes and stillbirth were not significantly raised. The authors called for "individual prenatal care", "especially regarding the communication with health care professionals"[4].

Pregnancy and birth outcomes, autistic and non-autistic women in Sweden, 2006 to 2014Share of singleton births with each outcome. Births to autistic women compared with births to women without an autism diagnosis: induction of labour 19.6% and 13.5%; elective caesarean 9.9% and 8.4%; preterm birth 6.7% and 4.7%; pre-eclampsia 4.1% and 2.7%; gestational diabetes 1.2% and 1.1%; stillbirth 0.3% and 0.3%.Births to autistic womenBirths to non-autistic women0%5%10%15%20%25%Induction of labour19.6%13.5%Elective caesarean9.9%8.4%Preterm birth (under 37weeks)6.7%4.7%Pre-eclampsia4.1%2.7%Gestational diabetes1.2%1.1%Stillbirth0.3%0.3%
Crude percentages of singleton births, Swedish Medical Birth Register, 2006–2014: 2,196 births to autistic women and 875,944 to women without an autism diagnosis. After adjustment the first four were significantly raised; the last two were not. Source: Sundelin et al., Clinical Epidemiology 2018.

Two large US studies give a more mixed picture. Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health system, compared 431 pregnancies among members with a clinician-documented autism diagnosis (1997–2024) with matched general-population pregnancies[1]. Preterm birth and hyperemesis gravidarum, severe pregnancy sickness (6.1% against 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio 2.71), were more common in the autistic group; pre-eclampsia was not, and gestational diabetes was similar. Autistic members used standard prenatal care as much as others but visited emergency departments more often. In US Medicaid, the public insurance programme that funds almost half of all US births, a national study of 2008–2019 found modestly higher rates of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension among 13,586 autistic birthing people than among 438,557 people without an intellectual or developmental disability[10].

StudyPreterm birthPre-eclampsia
Sweden, national registers, births 2006–2014; autistic women vs women without an autism diagnosis[4]6.7% vs 4.7% (adjusted OR 1.30)4.1% vs 2.7% (adjusted OR 1.34)
California, Kaiser Permanente, 1997–2024; 248 live births to autistic members vs matched general population[1]11.2% vs 7.5% (adjusted OR 1.83)6.1% vs 7.4% (no significant difference)
US Medicaid, births 2008–2019; autistic birthing people vs people without an intellectual or developmental disability[10]Not reported5.7% vs 4.4% (adjusted OR 1.10)

These studies are not directly comparable: they cover different decades, health systems and populations, and each counts only people whose autism was recorded. A large, mainly UK online survey found no significant differences in self-reported delivery type or gestational age[2]. None can say why some complications are more common. Together they show a group whose pregnancies merit closer attention, not less.

Depression and anxiety around birth are recorded two to five times as often

The most consistent finding concerns mental health, where the Californian researchers observed "the largest disparities"[1]. More than half of autistic members (52.8%) had depression recorded during pregnancy, against 15.6%, and the adjusted odds of depression before, during and after pregnancy were 2.7 to 5.7 times as high. Much of the gap exists before pregnancy, so services can see it coming; it persists after birth. Documented intimate partner violence in the two years before or during pregnancy was also more common (11.8% against 4.6%), a health need maternity services are meant to ask about.

Depression and anxiety recorded before, during and after pregnancy, Kaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaShare of pregnancies ending in a live birth with each mental health diagnosis recorded. Autistic members compared with matched general-population members: depression before pregnancy 27.4% and 8.8%; depression during pregnancy 52.8% and 15.6%; depression after birth 28.2% and 12.5%; anxiety during pregnancy 31.1% and 9.6%; anxiety after birth 26.6% and 10.8%.Autistic membersGeneral population0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Depression beforepregnancy27.4%8.8%Depression duringpregnancy52.8%15.6%Depression after birth28.2%12.5%Anxiety during pregnancy31.1%9.6%Anxiety after birth26.6%10.8%
Clinician-recorded diagnoses in the year before pregnancy, during pregnancy and the 12 months after birth; 248 live births to autistic members and 28,902 to matched general-population members, 1997–2024. Crude percentages; adjusted odds of depression were 2.7 to 5.7 times higher in the autistic group. Source: Ames et al., Autism in Adulthood 2025.

Other studies, using different methods, point the same way:

  • US Medicaid: 34.0% of autistic birthing people had an anxiety disorder and 32.8% a depressive disorder recorded in the year before or after delivery, against 6.5% and 7.5% of people without an intellectual or developmental disability; among those with no anxiety or depression recorded in the year before birth, autistic people were diagnosed in the year after at a significantly higher rate than those without such a disability (adjusted hazard ratios 3.2 and 2.4)[10].
  • Mainly UK survey: 38% of autistic respondents developed anxiety in pregnancy and 24% depression, against 14% and 9%[11]; after birth, 30% had been told by a professional they had postnatal depression, against 13%[2].
  • International survey: 40% of 355 autistic mothers reported antenatal depression and 60% postpartum depression, against 25% and 45% of 132 non-autistic mothers; the measure was not validated, and the comparison group, all mothers of autistic children, reported postnatal depression far above the 10–15% typical of population samples[3].
  • Cambridge-led longitudinal study: following 27 autistic and 25 non-autistic women (not all in the UK) from late pregnancy to six months after birth, when 22 and 29 remained, autistic participants scored higher on standard questionnaires for stress, depression and anxiety[12].

Why the gap exists is not settled; the UK survey's authors suggest physical difficulties in pregnancy and lower satisfaction with care "may contribute"[11]. In England, autistic parents interviewed about specialist perinatal mental health teams valued autism-informed care, though many found discharge difficult[8]; in interviews, 20 staff from four community perinatal mental health teams called autistic parents an unexpected part of their work and asked for perinatal-focused autism training and supervision, although all had done the mandatory Oliver McGowan training[13]. Our article on depression in autistic people covers the wider evidence.

Maternity care often overwhelms the senses and leaves people uninformed

The largest comparative survey we found of autistic people's maternity experiences, run online from Cambridge with respondents mostly in the UK, compared 417 autistic and 524 non-autistic people[11]. At prenatal appointments, autistic respondents were less likely to feel comfortable asking questions (57% against 90%), treated with respect (63% against 88%) or able to trust professionals (57% against 87%), and only 56% received as much information as they wanted, against 80%. Birth was harder still: they were more than twice as likely to feel overwhelmed by sensory input, and 88% of those on a shared postnatal ward found it a sensory overload[2]. In an international survey, 34% of autistic mothers said the process of birth had not been explained to them, against 17%[3].

Overwhelmed and judged: how autistic and non-autistic parents rated their maternity careShare of survey respondents agreeing with each statement. Autistic compared with non-autistic respondents: found the shared postnatal ward overwhelming in terms of sensory input 88% and 61%; felt overwhelmed by sensory input during birth 65% and 29%; felt negatively judged by professionals at prenatal appointments 54% and 26%; felt negatively judged at postnatal appointments 49% and 23%.Autistic respondentsNon-autistic respondents0%20%40%60%80%100%Shared postnatal ward wasa sensory overload88%61%Overwhelmed by sensoryinput during birth65%29%Felt negatively judged atprenatal appointments54%26%Felt negatively judged atpostnatal appointments49%23%
Online survey on each respondent's most recent pregnancy and birth: 417 autistic and 524 non-autistic people answered the pregnancy questions, 384 and 492 the birth and postnatal questions; most lived in the UK. Autistic respondents include people who self-identified; the ward question went only to those who stayed on a shared ward. Sources: Hampton et al., J Autism Dev Disord 2024; Hampton et al., J Autism Dev Disord 2023.

Qualitative research from several countries describes the same pattern. A 2026 systematic review of 10 studies with 301 participants identified, with high confidence, themes including "feeling over-stimulated", "feeling judged", "poor understanding of autism" and "not asking for help does not mean not needing help"[14]. In Brazil, interviews with 34 autistic women, three of them non-speaking, described symptoms dismissed, disrespectful care and the exclusion of non-speaking women, barriers that "operate systemically rather than individually"[15]. In a UK survey of care after pregnancy loss, 28.4% of autistic respondents never accessed care, and most experiences reported were negative, centred on communication, pain relief and the hospital environment[7]. In Australia, 13 perinatal clinicians interviewed for a qualitative study often relied on personal experience because formal training was lacking[16]. These barriers mirror those in our article on barriers to healthcare for autistic adults.

Asking for help can feel like a risk

Running through the evidence is a fear that being open about being autistic, or about struggling, will lead professionals to doubt a person's ability to parent. In the international survey, autistic mothers were more likely to feel their parenting was being judged and to feel unable to ask for support[3]; in the Cambridge survey, 54% felt negatively judged by professionals at prenatal appointments, against 26% of non-autistic respondents[11].

Interviews with 24 autistic women in late pregnancy, most in the UK, show what that can look like[17]. One said: "I've been asked by a couple of the midwives how I think I can be a mum if I'm autistic." Another reported that talking to her midwife about meltdowns led to what the researchers call an "unwarranted referral to social services", after which "I feel like if I say that I'm struggling they're going to forget all the ways in which I'm coping well." A 2021 review found that autistic parents are questioned by providers about their ability to parent and experience high rates of involvement with child protective services[5].

The research does not support the assumption behind those questions: in the Cambridge study that followed women from pregnancy, autistic and non-autistic mothers did not differ in parenting confidence, nurturance, involvement or routine at six months, though autistic mothers scored lower on one scale, discipline[12]. The cost of the fear falls on health: for mothers afraid of being judged, the international survey's authors warn, acknowledging postpartum depression and seeking treatment "may not feel like a viable option"[3]. And disclosure brings few adjustments: of 59 Cambridge survey respondents who told a professional during pregnancy that they were autistic, 83% were not offered home visits and 91% were not offered a community midwife to accompany them[11].

Breastfeeding: strong motivation, patchy support

Autistic parents are at least as likely as others to try to breastfeed (94% of autistic Cambridge survey respondents, against 91%)[2]. In an autistic-led UK online survey of 193 autistic people who had been pregnant, open to those awaiting a diagnosis or self-identifying as autistic, 87.2% of those who breastfed were motivated despite any difficulties and 48.9% found it positive always or most of the time, but 41.4% had an unpleasant feeling at let-down always or most of the time, and support was often inadequate[18]. Receiving support was significantly associated with better experiences; respondents asked for one-to-one help with continuity of carer. A review of 22 qualitative sources found services often inaccessible, and sensory challenges and pain that could feel unbearable[19].

What the evidence asks of us

The studies are few, but they agree on what would help.

  • Ask everyone, not only those with a diagnosis. Many autistic parents are undiagnosed or do not disclose, so communication and sensory needs should be asked about routinely: many "may not have or share a diagnosis"[7].
  • Make adjustments standard. A practice article published by the National Autistic Society, written by an autistic midwife, recommends low lighting, reduced noise, "minimal small talk and interruptions" and "clear, unambiguous language"[20]; the pregnancy charity Tommy's lists health passports, one named midwife and appointments at a predictable time[21]; a 2026 review adds consent-based touch, continuity where possible and tailored postnatal and feeding support[6].
  • Treat perinatal mental health as core care. The Californian authors call for "adequate perinatal mental health support"[1]; in England, autistic parents asked for autism-informed practitioners and peer groups, and staff proposed autism champions and autistic peer support workers[8][13].
  • Train staff, with autistic people leading. Reviews call for training on sensory and communication differences[14], and autistic-led researchers recommend it be delivered by autistic people[18]; our article on clinician knowledge of autism looks at why one-off training is not enough.
  • Judge parenting, not diagnosis. Being autistic, or mentioning meltdowns, should not on its own prompt doubts about someone's ability to parent; the evidence so far finds autistic and non-autistic mothers alike on nurturance and involvement[12].
  • Build the structures and the evidence. The National Autistic Society article calls for national guidelines, local protocols and autism leads in maternity services[20]; population data are needed too, especially in the UK, where we found no national figures on pregnancy outcomes for autistic women.

Being listened to is a safety issue in maternity care, not a courtesy, as our study of inequalities in maternal outcomes shows for other groups. Autistic women and birthing people ask for the same: to be heard, told clearly what is happening, and trusted as parents.

Language: this piece uses identity-first language ("autistic people", "autistic women and birthing people"), the preference of most autistic-led organisations, and each study's own terms for its participants where they differ. Clinical terms are used only when naming a study or diagnostic category.

Why we're publishing this

Health Insurance UK is a commercial health-insurance resource, not a charity and not a campaign. We compiled this evidence, as part of our Autism & Health research library, because autistic parents, and the organisations and midwives pushing for better maternity care, deserve the research clean, current and in one place. The case belongs to the autistic women and birthing people living it; our part is to stand alongside them and say plainly what the data show.

How to read this data

Register and health-record studies (Sweden, Ontario, California, US Medicaid) are large but count only people with a recorded autism diagnosis, so undiagnosed autistic parents sit in the comparison groups, and they measure what services recorded. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) compare odds, not risks; for common outcomes such as depression in pregnancy they overstate the ratio of the percentages. The Medicaid postpartum figures are hazard ratios, comparing rates of new diagnoses over time. The Californian autistic group is small (248 live births) and the Swedish data end in 2014. Survey figures are self-reported by people who chose to take part online (in the Cambridge pregnancy survey, 95% of autistic respondents were white) and include people who self-identify as autistic; qualitative studies describe experiences in depth but not how common they are. Figures from different studies are not directly comparable and are not a trend; almost all come from high-income countries. This is analysis of published research, not new research.

Use this data

Free to cite with attribution to Health Insurance UK. Charities, campaigners, maternity services and journalists are welcome to reuse these figures and charts. For the underlying figures as a spreadsheet, get in touch.

Suggested citation: Health Insurance UK (2026). Pregnant and Autistic: Higher Perinatal Risks, Too Few Adjustments. https://www.healthinsuranceuk.net/research/autism-pregnancy-maternity

Important: This article summarises published research for general information. It is not medical advice and cannot be used to diagnose, treat or predict anything about an individual. If you have concerns about your own or someone else's health, please speak to a qualified health professional.

Sources

  1. Ames JL, Anderson M, Cronbach E, Gassner DL, Greenberg M, Lee C, Giwa Onaiwu M, Croen LA. Obstetric care and pregnancy health in autistic individuals and those with other developmental disabilities in an integrated healthcare setting in California. Autism in Adulthood, 2025. europepmc.org/article/MED/42667063
  2. Hampton S, Allison C, Baron-Cohen S, Holt R. Autistic people’s perinatal experiences II: a survey of childbirth and postnatal experiences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2023. europepmc.org/article/MED/35445371
  3. Pohl AL, Crockford SK, Blakemore M, Allison C, Baron-Cohen S. A comparative study of autistic and non-autistic women’s experience of motherhood. Molecular Autism, 2020. europepmc.org/article/MED/31911826
  4. Sundelin HE, Stephansson O, Hultman CM, Ludvigsson JF. Pregnancy outcomes in women with autism: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Clinical Epidemiology, 2018. europepmc.org/article/MED/30555264
  5. McDonnell CG, DeLucia EA. Pregnancy and parenthood among autistic adults: implications for advancing maternal health and parental well-being. Autism in Adulthood, 2021. europepmc.org/article/MED/36601267
  6. Steinbrück PC, Byrne S, Tollenaere E. Autistic persons in the perinatal context: a mapping review of midwifery care, experiences, needs, and evidence. Midwifery, 2026. europepmc.org/article/MED/42570608
  7. Grant A, Griffiths C, Williams K, Brown AE. “I felt belittled and ridiculed for being in pain”: an online survey of Autistic people’s experience of care for pregnancy loss (perinatal loss) in the United Kingdom. Midwifery, 2025. europepmc.org/article/MED/39705968
  8. Westgate V, Thompson C, Caramaschi D, O’Mahen HA. ‘She’s so knowledgeable about autism’: autistic women and birthing people’s experiences of specialist perinatal mental health teams. BJPsych Open, 2026. europepmc.org/article/MED/42444189
  9. Tint A, Brown HK, Chen S, Lai MC, Tarasoff LA, Vigod SN, Parish S, Havercamp SM, Lunsky Y. Health characteristics of reproductive-aged autistic women in Ontario: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Autism, 2021. europepmc.org/article/MED/33467914
  10. Shea L, Sadowsky M, Tao S, Rast J, Schendel D, Chesnokova A, Headen I. Perinatal and postpartum health among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. JAMA Network Open, 2024. europepmc.org/article/MED/39145975
  11. Hampton S, Allison C, Baron-Cohen S, Holt R. Autistic people’s perinatal experiences I: a survey of pregnancy experiences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2024. europepmc.org/article/MED/36261629
  12. Hampton S, Allison C, Aydin E, Baron-Cohen S, Holt R. Autistic mothers’ perinatal well-being and parenting styles. Autism, 2022. europepmc.org/article/MED/35105233
  13. Westgate V, Thompson C, Caramaschi D, O’Mahen H. “I ask them what autism means for them”: a qualitative study of staff experiences of working with autistic women and birthing people in community perinatal mental health teams. BMC Psychiatry, 2025. europepmc.org/article/MED/41146091
  14. Smith L, Kirton J, West H, Jackson L, Herron K, Cherry MG. The interpersonal experiences of autistic women and birthing people in the perinatal period: a systematic review using the autistic SPACE framework. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2026. europepmc.org/article/MED/40611564
  15. Brilhante AVM, Brasil CCP, Silva RMD, et al. Communication barriers in perinatal care for autistic women: a qualitative study using the hermeneutic-dialectic circle in Brazil. PLoS One, 2026. europepmc.org/article/MED/42748175
  16. Love AMA, Edwards C, Rideout B, et al. Understanding healthcare professionals’ experiences supporting Autistic people in perinatal care: a qualitative study. Midwifery, 2026. europepmc.org/article/MED/42214238
  17. Hampton S, Man J, Allison C, Aydin E, Baron-Cohen S, Holt R. A qualitative exploration of autistic mothers’ experiences I: pregnancy experiences. Autism, 2023. europepmc.org/article/MED/36325726
  18. Grant A, Griffiths C, Williams K, Brown A. “It felt like I had an old fashioned telephone ringing in my breasts”: an online survey of UK Autistic birthing parents’ experiences of infant feeding. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 2024. europepmc.org/article/MED/37915119
  19. Grant A, Jones S, Williams K, Leigh J, Brown A. Autistic women’s views and experiences of infant feeding: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Autism, 2022. europepmc.org/article/MED/35411810
  20. Fox D. Supporting pregnant autistic people. National Autistic Society, 2022. autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/professional-practice/pregnant-autistic
  21. Tommy’s. Before, during and after pregnancy for autistic women and birthing people. Tommy’s, reviewed 2024. tommys.org/pregnancy-information/planning-pregnancy/health-conditions-and-planning-pregnancy/autism
Autism & Health · research library

More from this library

See all Autism & Health research

Get your free quoteA specialist broker calls you back Start